MSNBC Caught Manipulating Poll about Firearms?

Sometimes you do a double-take at a photo and have to say “huh”? Back on September 17th, 2019 I wrote about a poll that MSNBC was hosting about firearms. They had asked the questions “Do you think people should be allowed to carry guns in public?” Excellent question. And the results were very telling. At the time I had made a screen grab of the poll, 573,000+ people had voted and an overwhelming majority had voted “Yes” to that question! actually 92% at that time! That was quite eye opening. When you added one of the other choices “Yes for self defense only” (which is why 99.99% of people carry them anyway) the total was up over 97% for law abiding citizens being allowed to carry firearms in public! Note the numbers on the poll.

September 17th, 2019 screen grab.

Well that was great news and a very enlightening poll, best of all the size of the sampling, over 573K was not something to sneeze at. So I checked back on September 21st to see how it was doing. And to my great surprise it was still going strong. As of September 21st, 2019 the results were 93% in favor of allowing citizens to carry in public. Better yet the sampling size had gone up even more to over 847,000!

September 21st, 2019 screen grab.

So with this sampling size and these results you would think things are pretty obvious, right? Americans (if they limited the poll to US voters only) overwhelmingly were for law abiding citizens carrying firearms in public. To the point that it was not even close, what those in media might even call a “landslide”.

But wait! Remember who is conducting this poll, MSNBC, and as part of the anti-firearms establishment they can’t have a poll on their website that shows that kind of outstanding support for lawful firearms carry. So what can they do? Well here is where things got strange. Checking back on September 28th, 2019 the results had “changed” dramatically.

September 28th, 2019 screen grab.

Now 7 days later they have over 1,840,000 votes!?! And now the percentage of support for public carry is down to 47%. Something does not add up. Where did all of these “NO” votes all of a sudden come from? When all the previous days the overwhelming vote was “yes” now they have to be almost all for no in order to bring the number down to show that the “majority” now does not support public carry of firearms? How did all of a sudden there become this surge of anti-firearms rights votes?

There are only a few possibilities, you can choose for yourself. One, the anti-firearms rights groups got together and had a huge rally to vote in this poll. Since I monitor those groups and their postings, that did not happen. Not a single mention that I saw in any of their groups. So second, hackers. That is a possibility. When I checked with some of the people who had commented on my previous writings on this I found that people had voted multiple times by simply using different browsers. They said you could also use Chrome “incognito” tabs and vote as many times as you wanted. So that might account for a few of the votes (remember we are talking well over 1 million votes being added). Third, MSNBC simply added votes to bring the poll numbers more in line with their anti-firearms and anti-rights agendas? That would be a simple thing to do.

So I have a little challenge for MSNBC. Release the metrics and data on where and who voted for this poll that has over 2 Million votes at the time of this article! Any poll that magically goes for days and days with a 92 & 93% for one answer with over 800,000 votong all of a sudden swings the opposite way?

Come on MSNBC do you really think that people are so stupid they cannot see the manipulation of the numbers right in front of their faces as bold as this one was? And the lame-stream media wonders why people have no faith in the news agencies any longer and why they get accused of fake news, because they create fake news, now its obvious and easy to spot.

Advertisements

The Media Creates the Hatred that is Directed at Law Enforcement…

“Having been stabbed with a knife and spent a month in the hospital during my service time I can tell you knives can and do kill people all the time.”

With all of the talk and media coverage of the recent shooting in Virginia on how a lunatic lefty targeted Republican Congress members, this may have gone unnoticed but for the fact that I try to read any press, positive or negative, about the profession I have worked in all of my life.

I recently caught a headline on my Twitter feed (@downrangewithcw) that jumped out at me. “Pregnant Mother Shot Dead by Cops Whom She Called for Help.” If I was an average citizen who saw that and took it as truthful news, I would be outraged. How dare the cops gun down a pregnant female who called them for help without any justification? My anger and outrage would be justified, if that was the “whole story.”

Read the rest of the story here…

Fort Myers family asks Scott to review ‘Stand Your Ground’ ruling… really??

The NBC writer needs to check out the law before making themselves look foolish. As a 35+ year cop, and firearms instructor for LEO’s the “Justifiable Use of Force Laws” are actually fairly easy to understand IF YOU READ THEM. Here is the law that covers this incident;
776.013 Home protection; use or threatened use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using or threatening to use defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used or threatened was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses or threatens to use defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

Notice THIS IS NOT the supposed “Stand your ground” law that everyone talks about. The law is not called “stand your ground” it’s actually called : 776.012 Use or threatened use of force in defense of person. And the words stand your ground are only three words i the entire statute.

The LAW IS CLEAR in that a person is believed to be in fear of great bodily harm or death when someone is trying to break into your home or does break into your home (mistake or not) you do not wait around and ask the person why they are doing what they are. You do not have time to sit down and chat. This has nothing to do with the Justifiable Use of Force in Defense of a Person Law that the news is citing, it has to do with the defense of your home.

Please research the information better before reporting and making people think the wrong things, about the wrong laws, and misleading the public. This is why so many people now say the term “Fake News” so much.

Do You Know Where Your News Comes From?

“I would like to inform my readers that my entire funding is enough to buy a box of ammo now and then…and my reason is because I believe in the rights of people, as granted by God and the United States Constitution.”

I read a lot of news articles and opinion pieces and I get notices from various news sources on topics of interest to me. Through all of this, I have learned in the preceding few years that you cannot take for granted that the news source you are reading is a news source and not some biased opinion branch of some organization.

I recently got a note about a particular article from one of my followers who knows I like to read news on self-defense and firearms related topics. When I got this note, I saw the article from a website called The Trace. I always like to see where the people that are writing this information and passing it off as news are coming from, or at least where they get their “incentive” (code word for funding).

Read the rest of the story here.