The Virginia Democrats try to change a law to fire them for following their oath of office protecting the Constitution, Oh and outlaw any type of training to protect your rights or yourself.
There has been a lot of coverage in the social media world (very little on the mass media of course) of the newly elected Democratic Governor and Legislature in Virginia announcing that they would be moving full steam ahead with sweeping firearms laws that would turn millions of Virginia residents into criminals for simply possessing certain common firearms. This push seems to be being led by the newly elected Governor Ralph Northam.
From a Reuters report: “
“They want us to finally pass commonsense gun safety legislation, so no one has to fear being hurt or killed while at school, at work, or at their place of worship,” Northam said hours after the election results. “I look forward to working with our new Democratic majority to make these priorities a reality.”
The legislature will take on several proposals, including banning assault-style rifles and high-capacity magazines and raising the minimum age to 21 from 18 to buy a rifle or shotgun, said Dick Saslaw, the top Democrat in the state Senate.”
What they had not planned on was the overwhelming anger and reaction of the people of Virginia, and especially the county Sheriff’s and County Commissions.
The on November 21st, 2019 a Virginia Senator filed Bill 64 wants to make it illegal and a felony for anyone that:
“Teaches or demonstrates to any other person the use, application, or making of any firearm, explosive, or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons, knowing or having reason to know or intending that such training will be employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder”.
Now I don’t know about you but I teach firearms to citizens. And how am I supposed to know what they are going to use that training for? The thought police are alive and well in Virginia!
As of the writing of this article there were more than 70 counties and cities that had voted on resolutions that they are calling “Second Amendment Sanctuary” status. Whats does this mean? Well collectively they are stating that they will refuse to enforce any more 2nd Amendment restrictions that they feel are in violation of the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights, of the U.S. Constitution. Now I could debate that this is a bit late and long overdue. That if they are truly declaring this and mean it are they going to stop enforcing the current violations of the second amendment, but that is another whole article worth of thoughts.
In response to this growing trend of resistance to any new restrictions or laws, the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam came out swinging with threats to those sayign they would resist these laws, even if they thought them unconstitutional;
“If we have constitutional laws on the books and law enforcement officers are not enforcing those laws on the books, then there are going to be some consequences but I’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it,” Northam said. “
Well that was not well received of course, but then a Virginia representative really doubled down by basically recommending that the Governor use the Virginia National Guard to force compliance:
“And ultimately, I’m not the governor, but the governor may have to nationalize the National Guard to enforce the law,” Rep. Donald McEachin said. “That’s his call, because I don’t know how serious these counties are and how severe the violations of law will be. But that’s obviously an option he has.”
Now that was enough to send some into calling for armed resistance, the start of the next civil war and debates on if the national guard would even follow any such order to use possible force on the very citizens they are sworn to protect. But then Maj. Gen. Timothy P. Williams, the Adjutant General of VA stepped up and posted a response to the representatives statement by posting on Twitter (taking a play out of the Presidents playbook?):
Many think the tweet says that the VA National Guard would be willing to take action. I do not see that said anywhere, what I do see is the very obvious omission of any mention that the VA National Guard taking any side and no mention of response to the Representatives call.
So the big question is really how far will this go? Well the VA Democratic controlled Legislature decided to push the situation to an even higher level of anger and threats by filing Bill 67 in the legislature that would result in any law enforcement officer, Sheriff, or other public employee who refuses to enforce what they felt was an unconstitutional law (following the very oath of office they took) being fired and not able to be employed as such for at least 12 months.
So what does this all mean? Well Virginians elected a Democratic majority and a Democratic Governor and now are seeing exactly what that can mean for rights. We do not have the electoral college at the state level and this is what happens when highly populated dense areas are able to outvote all the other areas in a state and force upon the rest of the citizens the views that do not apply to them or the rest of the state. Elections have consequences. Turnout is key and the Republican turnout did not help in this state.
So what is going to happen in Virginia? Will the state legislature pass these obviously unconstitutional laws? And will the local county and city elected officials decide they are not going to enforce those new laws? If so will the Virginia government decide to try and fire all those law enforcement and county city officials who say no more restrictions? Or will the Governor of Virginia force the issue by employing the National Guard to try and use force against the very citizens they are sworn to protect and defend from unconstitutional enemies? That could result in armed conflict. If that happens will it spread to other places and outside Virginia? Could this be the spark that ignites the next American Civil War?
I think that people are beginning to see that our Constitutionally protected rights (they do not come from the Bill of Rights or Constitution, they are protected by it and restrict the Government from infringing on them) and they are tired of seeing more and more limitations being placed on rights.
Think about this for a second, only one right in the entire Bill of Rights includes the words “shall not be infringed”. There is a very good reason for that. The citizens were supposed to be able to have the same weapons as the standing army so that should it become necessary they could fight that standing army or the agents of the government to take it back and re-institute that Government of the People, by the People and for the People that our forefathers fought a war to establish and many have died to defend. Is it time again to feed the tree of liberty? #boogaloo
I would be very interested in your thoughts on the legislation, the stance of the people and where you think we are headed.