Do you care what the Court Jesters Say?

To Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, Robert DeNiro and the other idiots that think we care.

Recently with the continuing coverage of the incompetent Democrats trying to impeach President Trump, and after he was sworn in after being elected, there seems to be no end of people in Hollywood and the entertainment industry that think they need to use their platforms for telling all of the rest of us what they think we should feel and do. Award shows are less about the shows, music and award than they are about the 30 second spot that a winner or presenter gets to be able to talk about how much is wrong with the US and its system, and how much they hate the President.

What I do not understand is what makes these overpaid snowflakes think that we, the general public, care one bit that they do not like our current President or his executive orders, or for that matter have promised repeatedly to “move out of the country” if President Trump was elected. I am still waiting for them to keep their word on that one. But the thing that I think about is how in the world did someone that used to be called a “Court Jester” and was the laughing stock of the courts and residences around
Europe evolve into what they think they are today? We place them on a high pedestal and they think they are above and better than the rest. Money is one of the things that they have that makes them feel like it gives them the right or need to share their political views with those of us that actually work for a living. Now of course there are exceptions to every rule, and few of them realize they are no more important than the guy delivering newspapers early I the morning, but that is a rarity.

So as Court Jesters of old, our Actors, Singers and others that entertain us get paid to entertain, not politicize or trying to advocate. They are paid to make believe they are someone else. So when they are on some stage somewhere waxing about what they thing our newest President is or is not doing correctly, what makes them think we give it any more credence then the Court Jesters of old?

So to all of the Court Jesters out there (Entertainers, actors, musicians and the like) we really don’t care what you think politically, and all you are doing is make it less likely that people like myself will be spending our hard earned money to watch or listen to you. What do you think would happen is the same people that voted for the new President decided to no longer buy movie tickets, or listen to your music? You would no longer be in the position you are, so knock it off and get back to being the Court Jester you are supposed to be. We do not care what you think, only that you make us laugh, cry and have fun escaping reality, not listening to you spout it.

Background Checks and Red Flag laws and more laws would not have stopped Texas or Ohio Murderers.

So now that a bit more information on the murderers in those two incidents is coming out it is time to point a few minor things that those who are shouting “we must do something” and “it’s all President Trumps fault” fail to see or want to have pointed out since it will contradict their point of view.

So now that a bit more information on the murderers in those two incidents is coming out it is time to point a few minor things that those who are shouting “we must do something” and “it’s all President Trumps fault” fail to see or want to have pointed out since it will contradict their point of view.

First, there has been a cry for universal background checks for a couple of years. After every mass murder that uses a firearm, there is a cry for “universal background checks”. But what many who are for them don’t want to be said and will try and shout down anyone that dares to bring it up is that many of the mass murderers passed background checks to get the very firearms they used. The most recent two shootings, one in El Paso Texas and the other in Dayton Ohio both passed background checks. So what good would UBC’s do then if mass murderers with obvious questionable backgrounds can still pass them? When put that way kind of sounds stupid doesn’t it?

Then there are the “Red Flag” laws that everyone is touting as part of a possible solution. The only problem is not all of these laws are created equally. Some states, like my own of Florida, have already enacted these types of laws and guess what? They have found they are abused and were not thought out very well. Many states laws do not have any kind of due process written into them. You know that pesky thing called your right to due process under the law. Sound familiar? Anytime that the Government wants to take away a persons property or right (owning and possessing a firearm is both of those) they should have to go before a Judge, and have a chance to defend themselves in a court of law. Our system was founded on that very principle. Circumventing that now for firearms can and will lead to further infringements. Don’t get in an argument with a vindictive ex-spouse or such, all they need do is call the police, tell them you own guns and made threats. No need to substantiate it and prove it, you have to prove you did not. Isn’t that twisted around from what our system is supposed to be like?

And for those crying that we have to do something. Why? The Murder rate is actually down by >40% since 1993. People are waking up all across this great country and realizing that self-defense and defense of your family is your responsibility, not the government. The last three mass murders, Gilroy, El Paso, and Dayton all took place in or as people exited a gun-free zone. Read this excerpt from the El Paso murderer’s supposed manifesto and you see that they (the mass murderers) think about this:


Attack low-security targets. Even though you might out gun a security guard or police man, they likely beat you in armor, training and numbers. Do not throw away your life on an unnecessarily dangerous target. If a target seems too hot, live to fight another day.


So what would have stopped him? More security? More police in the area? Why do you think they do not attack police stations or federal buildings or other hardened targets? Because the chances of being shot before they can cause much carnage is greater. People wonder why no one in Texas was carrying (big state for carry rights and laws) but all one need do is look at the Walmart and the demographics of the area and you will see why. The Walmart was a posted “gun-free zone” and in Texas, if posted properly with 30.05, 30.06 and 30.07 signs, it makes legal carry in the establishment illegal. So again law-abiding citizens are disarmed, and the mass murderer could care less and murdered 22 people, AND NOT ONE WAS LEGALLY ALLOWED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES! Does that not sound wrong to you? Obviously, it worked in the murderers’ favor.

And last of course is blaming the current President for these shootings. People say it is his “message” that caused the murderers to go out and kill (even though the murderer in Texas made it clear it was not) like he ordered them to go out and kill people. If this is the case why did he post tweets in support of certain specific Democratic candidates before the murderers? Shouldn’t we blame them then instead? Of course not. You don’t blame the actions of a psychopath or sociopath on others. You blame the person themselves.

So let’s just stick to the facts. We now have a mass murderer who clearly said that they pick “low-security targets” that have little chance of them being confronted or engaged by armed resistance. Maybe we should listen to him and use that against the next one? Self-defense and defense of your family is your responsibility and not the governments. Police (I was one for 38+ years) only come when called. You have to be alive to call them. And why do you call them? Because they bring firearms to the scene to confront the armed attacker. Would it not be better to not have to wait and be at the mercy of these deranged individuals? When most mass murders are over in minutes and it takes law enforcement minutes to get there, what do you do in the meantime? Hide and hope not to die? Sorry, not in my nature.

So I guess what it all boils down to is the cry from those wanting something done, and something is done now, just what do you propose that would have stopped any one of the last 10 or 20 mass murderers over the past couple of years? Please give us a solution or idea. Since Murder is already illegal and carries the stiffest of penalties in some places (death) and that does not seem to stop them, please don’t propose a law that only disarms more law-abiding citizens. Let’s hear some concrete thought out helpful ideas and stop playing the blame game, blaming President Trump, blaming guns, blaming poor mental health screening, but not blaming the real root causes. Those are for another article.